AWS EventBridge Rule Disabled or Deleted
Identifies when an Amazon EventBridge rule is disabled or deleted. EventBridge rules are commonly used to automate operational workflows and security-relevant routing (for example, forwarding events to Lambda, SNS/SQS, or security tooling). Disabling or deleting a rule can break critical integrations, suppress detections, and reduce visibility. Adversaries may intentionally impair EventBridge rules to disrupt monitoring, delay response, or hide follow-on actions.
Rule type: query
Rule indices:
- filebeat-*
- logs-aws.cloudtrail-*
Rule Severity: low
Risk Score: 21
Runs every:
Searches indices from: now-6m
Maximum alerts per execution: ?
References:
- https://docs.aws.amazon.com/eventbridge/latest/APIReference/API_DeleteRule.html
- https://docs.aws.amazon.com/eventbridge/latest/APIReference/API_DisableRule.html
Tags:
- Domain: Cloud
- Data Source: AWS
- Data Source: Amazon Web Services
- Data Source: AWS EventBridge
- Tactic: Impact
- Resources: Investigation Guide
Version: ?
Rule authors:
- Austin Songer
- Elastic
Rule license: Elastic License v2
Disclaimer: This investigation guide was created using generative AI technology and has been reviewed to improve its accuracy and relevance. While every effort has been made to ensure its quality, we recommend validating the content and adapting it to suit your specific environment and operational needs.
EventBridge rules define when events are matched and where they are delivered. Disabling or deleting a rule can interrupt automation, break alerting pipelines, and create blind spots in detection coverage. In security-focused designs, EventBridge is frequently used to forward CloudTrail findings, Config/Security Hub events, GuardDuty findings, or application security signals to downstream responders.
This rule detects successful DisableRule or DeleteRule actions. Depending on what the affected rule does, this activity
may indicate routine operational work or deliberate impairment of monitoring and response paths.
Identify the actor and access path
- Review
aws.cloudtrail.user_identity.arnandaws.cloudtrail.user_identity.access_key_idto determine which principal performed the change. - Review
user.name,user_agent.original, andsource.ipto understand how the action was performed (console vs CLI/SDK/automation) and from where.
Confirm what changed and what it impacts
- Use
aws.cloudtrail.request_parametersto identify the rule name/ARN and whether the action wasDisableRuleorDeleteRule. - Determine what the rule was used for and assess blast radius:
- Was the rule on a shared event bus or a critical account/region?
- Was it a centralized “security routing” rule that aggregates events from many accounts?
Reconstruct timing and sequence
- Correlate
@timestampwith surrounding CloudTrail activity for the same actor and the same rule name/ARN. - Look for companion actions that often occur with impairment attempts:
- IAM changes that expand permissions (
PutRolePolicy,AttachRolePolicy,UpdateAssumeRolePolicy, access key creation). - Changes that disable other telemetry or controls (CloudTrail changes, Config recorder stopped, GuardDuty/Security Hub changes).
- Follow-on actions against sensitive services immediately after the rule was disabled/deleted.
- IAM changes that expand permissions (
Validate authorization and change management
- Check whether the change aligns with a known deployment, infrastructure-as-code run, or approved change ticket. Confirm with the owning team whether the rule was intentionally disabled/deleted and whether there is a documented replacement.
- Planned maintenance and refactoring
- Rules may be removed during redesign of event patterns, target migrations, or application decommissioning.
- Infrastructure-as-code or automation
- CI/CD pipelines and IaC (Terraform/CloudFormation/CDK) can disable/delete rules during drift correction or environment rotation.
Restore visibility and business function
- If the rule is security- or business-critical, restore functionality immediately:
- Re-enable the rule if it was disabled.
- If deleted, recreate it from the last known-good baseline (IaC state, templates, or documented configuration).
- Validate delivery by confirming new matching events reach intended targets (for example, downstream Lambda/SNS/SQS) and that monitoring pipelines resume.
Contain potential compromise
- If the actor is unexpected or the access path is suspicious:
- Restrict the principal’s permissions to EventBridge and related services while you investigate (least-privilege containment).
- Rotate/disable credentials associated with
aws.cloudtrail.user_identity.access_key_idwhen applicable. - For assumed roles, investigate the originating principal and consider temporarily limiting role assumption via IAM conditions or trust policy changes.
Scope the incident
- Pivot in CloudTrail using the same
aws.cloudtrail.user_identity.arn, access key, andsource.ipto identify additional EventBridge rule modifications, changes to event buses, permissions, or resource policies that could enable unauthorized routing. - Determine whether the rule impairment created a monitoring gap and identify the time window of reduced visibility for retrospective review.
Hardening and prevention
- Reduce the likelihood of silent impairment:
- Restrict
events:DisableRuleandevents:DeleteRuleto a small set of administrative roles; use IAM conditions (for example,aws:PrincipalArn,aws:RequestedRegion, source VPC/IP conditions where appropriate). - Consider AWS Organizations SCP guardrails in production accounts to limit destructive EventBridge changes.
- Restrict
event.dataset: aws.cloudtrail
and event.provider: events.amazonaws.com
and event.action: (DeleteRule or DisableRule)
and event.outcome: success
Framework: MITRE ATT&CK
Tactic:
- Name: Impact
- Id: TA0040
- Reference URL: https://attack.mitre.org/tactics/TA0040/
Technique:
- Name: Service Stop
- Id: T1489
- Reference URL: https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1489/