Delete By Query API
editDelete By Query API
editThe simplest usage of _delete_by_query just performs a deletion on every
document that match a query. Here is the API:
|
The query must be passed as a value to the |
That will return something like this:
{
"took" : 147,
"timed_out": false,
"deleted": 119,
"batches": 1,
"version_conflicts": 0,
"noops": 0,
"retries": {
"bulk": 0,
"search": 0
},
"throttled_millis": 0,
"requests_per_second": -1.0,
"throttled_until_millis": 0,
"total": 119,
"failures" : [ ]
}
_delete_by_query gets a snapshot of the index when it starts and deletes what
it finds using internal versioning. That means that you’ll get a version
conflict if the document changes between the time when the snapshot was taken
and when the delete request is processed. When the versions match the document
is deleted.
Since internal versioning does not support the value 0 as a valid
version number, documents with version equal to zero cannot be deleted using
_delete_by_query and will fail the request.
During the _delete_by_query execution, multiple search requests are sequentially
executed in order to find all the matching documents to delete. Every time a batch
of documents is found, a corresponding bulk request is executed to delete all
these documents. In case a search or bulk request got rejected, _delete_by_query
relies on a default policy to retry rejected requests (up to 10 times, with
exponential back off). Reaching the maximum retries limit causes the _delete_by_query
to abort and all failures are returned in the failures of the response.
The deletions that have been performed still stick. In other words, the process
is not rolled back, only aborted. While the first failure causes the abort, all
failures that are returned by the failing bulk request are returned in the failures
element; therefore it’s possible for there to be quite a few failed entities.
If you’d like to count version conflicts rather than cause them to abort then
set conflicts=proceed on the url or "conflicts": "proceed" in the request body.
Back to the API format, you can limit _delete_by_query to a single type. This
will only delete tweet documents from the twitter index:
POST twitter/tweet/_delete_by_query?conflicts=proceed
{
"query": {
"match_all": {}
}
}
It’s also possible to delete documents of multiple indexes and multiple types at once, just like the search API:
POST twitter,blog/tweet,post/_delete_by_query
{
"query": {
"match_all": {}
}
}
If you provide routing then the routing is copied to the scroll query,
limiting the process to the shards that match that routing value:
POST twitter/_delete_by_query?routing=1
{
"query": {
"range" : {
"age" : {
"gte" : 10
}
}
}
}
By default _delete_by_query uses scroll batches of 1000. You can change the
batch size with the scroll_size URL parameter:
POST twitter/_delete_by_query?scroll_size=5000
{
"query": {
"term": {
"user": "kimchy"
}
}
}
URL Parameters
editIn addition to the standard parameters like pretty, the Delete By Query API
also supports refresh, wait_for_completion, wait_for_active_shards, and timeout.
Sending the refresh will refresh all shards involved in the delete by query
once the request completes. This is different than the Delete API’s refresh
parameter which causes just the shard that received the delete request
to be refreshed.
If the request contains wait_for_completion=false then Elasticsearch will
perform some preflight checks, launch the request, and then return a task
which can be used with Tasks APIs
to cancel or get the status of the task. Elasticsearch will also create a
record of this task as a document at .tasks/task/${taskId}. This is yours
to keep or remove as you see fit. When you are done with it, delete it so
Elasticsearch can reclaim the space it uses.
wait_for_active_shards controls how many copies of a shard must be active
before proceeding with the request. See here
for details. timeout controls how long each write request waits for unavailable
shards to become available. Both work exactly how they work in the
Bulk API.
requests_per_second can be set to any positive decimal number (1.4, 6,
1000, etc) and throttles the number of requests per second that the delete-by-query
issues or it can be set to -1 to disabled throttling. The throttling is done
waiting between bulk batches so that it can manipulate the scroll timeout. The
wait time is the difference between the time it took the batch to complete and
the time requests_per_second * requests_in_the_batch. Since the batch isn’t
broken into multiple bulk requests large batch sizes will cause Elasticsearch
to create many requests and then wait for a while before starting the next set.
This is "bursty" instead of "smooth". The default is -1.
Response body
editThe JSON response looks like this:
{
"took" : 639,
"deleted": 0,
"batches": 1,
"version_conflicts": 2,
"retries": 0,
"throttled_millis": 0,
"failures" : [ ]
}
-
took - The number of milliseconds from start to end of the whole operation.
-
deleted - The number of documents that were successfully deleted.
-
batches - The number of scroll responses pulled back by the the delete by query.
-
version_conflicts - The number of version conflicts that the delete by query hit.
-
retries - The number of retries that the delete by query did in response to a full queue.
-
throttled_millis -
Number of milliseconds the request slept to conform to
requests_per_second. -
failures -
Array of all indexing failures. If this is non-empty then the request aborted
because of those failures. See
conflictsfor how to prevent version conflicts from aborting the operation.
Works with the Task API
editYou can fetch the status of any running delete-by-query requests with the Task API:
GET _tasks?detailed=true&actions=*/delete/byquery
The responses looks like:
{
"nodes" : {
"r1A2WoRbTwKZ516z6NEs5A" : {
"name" : "r1A2WoR",
"transport_address" : "127.0.0.1:9300",
"host" : "127.0.0.1",
"ip" : "127.0.0.1:9300",
"attributes" : {
"testattr" : "test",
"portsfile" : "true"
},
"tasks" : {
"r1A2WoRbTwKZ516z6NEs5A:36619" : {
"node" : "r1A2WoRbTwKZ516z6NEs5A",
"id" : 36619,
"type" : "transport",
"action" : "indices:data/write/delete/byquery",
"status" : {
"total" : 6154,
"updated" : 0,
"created" : 0,
"deleted" : 3500,
"batches" : 36,
"version_conflicts" : 0,
"noops" : 0,
"retries": 0,
"throttled_millis": 0
},
"description" : ""
}
}
}
}
}
|
this object contains the actual status. It is just like the response json
with the important addition of the |
With the task id you can look up the task directly:
GET /_tasks/taskId:1
The advantage of this API is that it integrates with wait_for_completion=false
to transparently return the status of completed tasks. If the task is completed
and wait_for_completion=false was set on it then it’ll come back with
results or an error field. The cost of this feature is the document that
wait_for_completion=false creates at .tasks/task/${taskId}. It is up to
you to delete that document.
Works with the Cancel Task API
editAny Delete By Query can be canceled using the Task Cancel API:
POST _tasks/task_id:1/_cancel
The task_id can be found using the tasks API above.
Cancellation should happen quickly but might take a few seconds. The task status API above will continue to list the task until it is wakes to cancel itself.
Rethrottling
editThe value of requests_per_second can be changed on a running delete by query
using the _rethrottle API:
POST _delete_by_query/task_id:1/_rethrottle?requests_per_second=-1
The task_id can be found using the tasks API above.
Just like when setting it on the _delete_by_query API requests_per_second
can be either -1 to disable throttling or any decimal number
like 1.7 or 12 to throttle to that level. Rethrottling that speeds up the
query takes effect immediately but rethrotting that slows down the query will
take effect on after completing the current batch. This prevents scroll
timeouts.
Manually slicing
editDelete-by-query supports Sliced Scroll allowing you to manually parallelize the process relatively easily:
POST twitter/_delete_by_query
{
"slice": {
"id": 0,
"max": 2
},
"query": {
"range": {
"likes": {
"lt": 10
}
}
}
}
POST twitter/_delete_by_query
{
"slice": {
"id": 1,
"max": 2
},
"query": {
"range": {
"likes": {
"lt": 10
}
}
}
}
Which you can verify works with:
GET _refresh
POST twitter/_search?size=0&filter_path=hits.total
{
"query": {
"range": {
"likes": {
"lt": 10
}
}
}
}
Which results in a sensible total like this one:
{
"hits": {
"total": 0
}
}
Automatic slicing
editYou can also let delete-by-query automatically parallelize using
Sliced Scroll to slice on _uid:
POST twitter/_delete_by_query?refresh&slices=5
{
"query": {
"range": {
"likes": {
"lt": 10
}
}
}
}
Which you also can verify works with:
POST twitter/_search?size=0&filter_path=hits.total
{
"query": {
"range": {
"likes": {
"lt": 10
}
}
}
}
Which results in a sensible total like this one:
{
"hits": {
"total": 0
}
}
Adding slices to _delete_by_query just automates the manual process used in
the section above, creating sub-requests which means it has some quirks:
-
You can see these requests in the
Tasks APIs. These sub-requests are "child"
tasks of the task for the request with
slices. -
Fetching the status of the task for the request with
slicesonly contains the status of completed slices. - These sub-requests are individually addressable for things like cancellation and rethrottling.
-
Rethrottling the request with
sliceswill rethrottle the unfinished sub-request proportionally. -
Canceling the request with
sliceswill cancel each sub-request. -
Due to the nature of
sliceseach sub-request won’t get a perfectly even portion of the documents. All documents will be addressed, but some slices may be larger than others. Expect larger slices to have a more even distribution. -
Parameters like
requests_per_secondandsizeon a request withslicesare distributed proportionally to each sub-request. Combine that with the point above about distribution being uneven and you should conclude that the usingsizewithslicesmight not result in exactlysizedocuments being `_delete_by_query`ed. - Each sub-requests gets a slightly different snapshot of the source index though these are all taken at approximately the same time.
Picking the number of slices
editAt this point we have a few recommendations around the number of slices to
use (the max parameter in the slice API if manually parallelizing):
-
Don’t use large numbers.
500creates fairly massive CPU thrash. - It is more efficient from a query performance standpoint to use some multiple of the number of shards in the source index.
- Using exactly as many shards as are in the source index is the most efficient from a query performance standpoint.
-
Indexing performance should scale linearly across available resources with
the number of
slices. - Whether indexing or query performance dominates that process depends on lots of factors like the documents being reindexed and the cluster doing the reindexing.