Histogram aggregation

The response above show that no documents has a price that falls within the range of [100, 150). By default the response will fill gaps in the histogram with empty buckets. It is possible to change that and request buckets with a higher minimum count thanks to the min_doc_count setting:

POST /sales/_search?size=0
{
  "aggs": {
    "prices": {
      "histogram": {
        "field": "price",
        "interval": 50,
        "min_doc_count": 1
      }
    }
  }
}

Response:

{
  ...
  "aggregations": {
    "prices": {
      "buckets": [
        {
          "key": 0.0,
          "doc_count": 1
        },
        {
          "key": 50.0,
          "doc_count": 1
        },
        {
          "key": 150.0,
          "doc_count": 2
        },
        {
          "key": 200.0,
          "doc_count": 3
        }
      ]
    }
  }
}

By default the histogram returns all the buckets within the range of the data itself, that is, the documents with the smallest values (on which with histogram) will determine the min bucket (the bucket with the smallest key) and the documents with the highest values will determine the max bucket (the bucket with the highest key). Often, when requesting empty buckets, this causes a confusion, specifically, when the data is also filtered.

To understand why, let’s look at an example:

Lets say the you’re filtering your request to get all docs with values between 0 and 500, in addition you’d like to slice the data per price using a histogram with an interval of 50. You also specify "min_doc_count" : 0 as you’d like to get all buckets even the empty ones. If it happens that all products (documents) have prices higher than 100, the first bucket you’ll get will be the one with 100 as its key. This is confusing, as many times, you’d also like to get those buckets between 0 - 100.

With extended_bounds setting, you now can "force" the histogram aggregation to start building buckets on a specific min value and also keep on building buckets up to a max value (even if there are no documents anymore). Using extended_bounds only makes sense when min_doc_count is 0 (the empty buckets will never be returned if min_doc_count is greater than 0).

Note that (as the name suggest) extended_bounds is not filtering buckets. Meaning, if the extended_bounds.min is higher than the values extracted from the documents, the documents will still dictate what the first bucket will be (and the same goes for the extended_bounds.max and the last bucket). For filtering buckets, one should nest the histogram aggregation under a range filter aggregation with the appropriate from/to settings.

Example:

POST /sales/_search?size=0
{
  "query": {
    "constant_score": { "filter": { "range": { "price": { "to": "500" } } } }
  },
  "aggs": {
    "prices": {
      "histogram": {
        "field": "price",
        "interval": 50,
        "extended_bounds": {
          "min": 0,
          "max": 500
        }
      }
    }
  }
}

When aggregating ranges, buckets are based on the values of the returned documents. This means the response may include buckets outside of a query’s range. For example, if your query looks for values greater than 100, and you have a range covering 50 to 150, and an interval of 50, that document will land in 3 buckets - 50, 100, and 150. In general, it’s best to think of the query and aggregation steps as independent - the query selects a set of documents, and then the aggregation buckets those documents without regard to how they were selected. See note on bucketing range fields for more information and an example.

The hard_bounds is a counterpart of extended_bounds and can limit the range of buckets in the histogram. It is particularly useful in the case of open data ranges that can result in a very large number of buckets.

Example:

POST /sales/_search?size=0
{
  "query": {
    "constant_score": { "filter": { "range": { "price": { "to": "500" } } } }
  },
  "aggs": {
    "prices": {
      "histogram": {
        "field": "price",
        "interval": 50,
        "hard_bounds": {
          "min": 100,
          "max": 200
        }
      }
    }
  }
}

In this example even though the range specified in the query is up to 500, the histogram will only have 2 buckets starting at 100 and 150. All other buckets will be omitted even if documents that should go to this buckets are present in the results.

By default the returned buckets are sorted by their key ascending, though the order behaviour can be controlled using the order setting. Supports the same order functionality as the Terms Aggregation.

By default the bucket keys start with 0 and then continue in even spaced steps of interval, e.g. if the interval is 10, the first three buckets (assuming there is data inside them) will be [0, 10), [10, 20), [20, 30). The bucket boundaries can be shifted by using the offset option.

This can be best illustrated with an example. If there are 10 documents with values ranging from 5 to 14, using interval 10 will result in two buckets with 5 documents each. If an additional offset 5 is used, there will be only one single bucket [5, 15) containing all the 10 documents.

By default, the buckets are returned as an ordered array. It is also possible to request the response as a hash instead keyed by the buckets keys:

POST /sales/_search?size=0
{
  "aggs": {
    "prices": {
      "histogram": {
        "field": "price",
        "interval": 50,
        "keyed": true
      }
    }
  }
}

Response:

{
  ...
  "aggregations": {
    "prices": {
      "buckets": {
        "0.0": {
          "key": 0.0,
          "doc_count": 1
        },
        "50.0": {
          "key": 50.0,
          "doc_count": 1
        },
        "100.0": {
          "key": 100.0,
          "doc_count": 0
        },
        "150.0": {
          "key": 150.0,
          "doc_count": 2
        },
        "200.0": {
          "key": 200.0,
          "doc_count": 3
        }
      }
    }
  }
}

The missing parameter defines how documents that are missing a value should be treated. By default they will be ignored but it is also possible to treat them as if they had a value.

POST /sales/_search?size=0
{
  "aggs": {
    "quantity": {
      "histogram": {
        "field": "quantity",
        "interval": 10,
        "missing": 0 
      }
    }
  }
}

Running a histogram aggregation over histogram fields computes the total number of counts for each interval.

For example, executing a histogram aggregation against the following index that stores pre-aggregated histograms with latency metrics (in milliseconds) for different networks:

PUT metrics_index/_doc/1
{
  "network.name" : "net-1",
  "latency_histo" : {
      "values" : [1, 3, 8, 12, 15],
      "counts" : [3, 7, 23, 12, 6]
   }
}

PUT metrics_index/_doc/2
{
  "network.name" : "net-2",
  "latency_histo" : {
      "values" : [1, 6, 8, 12, 14],
      "counts" : [8, 17, 8, 7, 6]
   }
}

POST /metrics_index/_search?size=0
{
  "aggs": {
    "latency_buckets": {
      "histogram": {
        "field": "latency_histo",
        "interval": 5
      }
    }
  }
}

The histogram aggregation will sum the counts of each interval computed based on the values and return the following output:

{
  ...
  "aggregations": {
    "prices": {
      "buckets": [
        {
          "key": 0.0,
          "doc_count": 18
        },
        {
          "key": 5.0,
          "doc_count": 48
        },
        {
          "key": 10.0,
          "doc_count": 25
        },
        {
          "key": 15.0,
          "doc_count": 6
        }
      ]
    }
  }
}

Also, when running histogram aggregation over histogram field the missing parameter is not supported.