Relation names inference
editRelation names inference
editRelation names
editPrior to Elasticsearch 6.x you could have multiple types per index. They acted as a discrimatory column but were often confused with tables. The fact that the mapping API’s treated them as seperate entities did not help.
The general guideline has always been to use a single type per index. Starting from 6.x this is also enforced. Some features still need to store multiple types in a single index such as Parent/Child join relations.
Both Parent and Child will need to have resolve to the same typename to be indexed into the same index.
Therefore in 6.x we need a different type that translates a CLR type to a join relation. This can be configured seperately
using .RelationName()
var settings = new ConnectionSettings()
.DefaultMappingFor<CommitActivity>(m => m
.IndexName("projects-and-commits")
.RelationName("commits")
)
.DefaultMappingFor<Project>(m => m
.IndexName("projects-and-commits")
.RelationName("projects")
);
var resolver = new RelationNameResolver(settings);
var relation = resolver.Resolve<Project>();
relation.Should().Be("projects");
relation = resolver.Resolve<CommitActivity>();
relation.Should().Be("commits");
RelationName uses the DefaultTypeNameInferrer to translate CLR types to a string representation.
Explicit TypeName configuration does not affect how the default relation for the CLR type
is represented though
var settings = new ConnectionSettings()
.DefaultMappingFor<Project>(m => m
.IndexName("projects-and-commits")
);
var resolver = new RelationNameResolver(settings);
var relation = resolver.Resolve<Project>();
relation.Should().Be("project");